The application of precautionary measures in the Ecuadorian judicial system: study of ruling 034-13-SCN-CC

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v9i1.4322

Keywords:

Constitution, court judgment, legal procedure, (UNESCO Thesaurus)

Abstract

The general objective of the research was to legally analyze the application of precautionary measures in the Ecuadorian judicial system: Study of Judgment 034-13-Scn-CC. The present research used the quantitative method which produces descriptive data, originating from data collection. Supported by the documentary-bibliographic review. In addition, the inductive-deductive method was applied, which suggests that in order to find a truth, facts must be sought. The analytical-synthetic method was also used. It is concluded that it is necessary to implement a regulation that grants effective guarantee that all decisions regarding constitutional precautionary measures are sent to the Constitutional Court of Ecuador for review, which will allow identifying and correcting errors that may arise in their application; at the same time, this regulation should also establish that this body should carry out a more constant control of all these decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguirrezabal Grünstein, M., (2015). Recepción de la medida cautelar innovadora y su delimitación con otras formas de tutela cautelar. [Reception of the innovative precautionary measure and its delimitation with other forms of delimitation with other forms of precautionary protection]. Revista Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas, 45(122), 35-66. https://n9.cl/lbu3e

Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. https://n9.cl/sia

Asamblea Nacional. (2009). Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional. Ley 0. Registro Oficial Suplemento 52 de 22-oct-2009. Estado: Vigente. https://n9.cl/su7v

Cervantes, A. (2020). Las Medidas Cautelares constitucionales y su desarrollo en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. [Constitutional Precautionary Measures and their development in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador]. Revista Ruptura, (02), 171-210. https://doi.org/10.26807/rr.vi02.23

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2013). Sentencia No. 034-13-SCN-CC. [Ruling No. 034-13-SCN-CC]. https://n9.cl/oyab1

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2021). Sentencia: No. 889-20-JP/21. [Ruling: No. 889-20-JP/21]. https://n9.cl/a8vvy

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2022). Sentencia: No. 964-17-EP/22. [Ruling: No. 964-17-EP/22]. https://n9.cl/bcgk0

Dávila Newman, G. (2006). El razonamiento inductivo y deductivo dentro del proceso investigativo en ciencias experimentales y sociales. [Inductive and deductive reasoning within the research process in experimental and social sciences]. Laurus, 12(Ext), 180-205. https://n9.cl/nx847

Marcheco Acuña, B. (2017). La tutela cautelar en los procesos contra la administración pública en Ecuador. [Precautionary protection in proceedings against the public administration in Ecuador]. Revista de derecho (Valdivia), 30(1), 263-285. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09502017000100011

Rodríguez, A., y Pérez, A. O. (2017). Métodos científicos de indagación y de construcción del conocimiento. [Scientific methods of inquiry and knowledge construction]. Revista EAN, 82, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n82.2017.1647

Salazar Fernández, E. (2013). Las medidas cautelares en el proceso contencioso administrativo: la necesidad de argumentación en función a sus requisitos especiales. UCV-HACER. [Precautionary measures in the administrative litigation process: the need for argumentation according to their special requirements. UCV-HACER]. Revista de Investigación y Cultura, 2(2),125-145. https://n9.cl/n2x165

Terán Suárez, R. (2021). Las medidas cautelares constitucionales en Ecuador. [Constitutional precautionary measures in Ecuador]. Revista Jurídica Crítica y Derecho, 2(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.29166/cyd.v1i2.2807

Villalta-Hidalgo, G. Y., y Oswaldo-Líber, A. S. (2022). Análisis jurídico sobre la temporalidad de las medidas cautelares en la acción de protección. [Legal analysis of the temporality of precautionary measures in protective actions]. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 7(2), 1062-1071. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2359

Published

2024-10-01

How to Cite

Bautista-Basurto, A. M., Cinthia Mariela, C. P., & Ros-Alvarez, D. (2024). The application of precautionary measures in the Ecuadorian judicial system: study of ruling 034-13-SCN-CC. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 9(1), 921–931. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v9i1.4322

Issue

Section

De Investigación

Most read articles by the same author(s)