Current overview of friction space closure in orthodontics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/s.v.v8i2.4269Keywords:
Crowns, dental prosthesis, dental implants, (Source: DeCS)Abstract
Objective: To analyze the advantages and disadvantages of self-ligating and conventional brackets in orthodontic friction reduction. Methods: A systematic review was carried out of studies published between 2014 and 2024, selected using the PRISMA method in databases such as Scopus, PubMed and Proquest. Twenty-one articles on friction and effectiveness in gap closure were analyzed. Results: Self-ligating brackets significantly reduced friction and improved treatment efficiency, although they presented limitations in the correction of rotations. Conclusions: New orthodontic technologies, such as self-ligating brackets, offer benefits in friction reduction, but treatment success depends on the skill of the orthodontist and proper choice of devices.
Downloads
References
Cervera Sabater A, Simón Pardell M. Sugerencias prácticas Fricción en arco recto [Practical hints Straight arc friction]. Biomecánica básica. 2010;33(1):65-72. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4547959
Monroy G, Uribe Y, Beltrán B. Producción científica sobre el abordaje de la fricción en ortodoncia [Scientific production on the approach to friction in orthodontics]. Acta Odontol. Colomb. 2021;2027-7822. https://doi.org/10.15446/aoc.v11n2.91853
Mittal R, Attri S, Batra P, Sonar S, Sharma K, Raghavan S. Comparison of orthodontic space closure using micro-osteoperforation and passive self-ligating appliances or conventional fixed appliances: A randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthodontist. 2020;90(5):634-639. https://doi.org/10.2319/111119-712.1
Cobos Torres JC, Ramos R, Ortega Castro JC, Ortega Lopez MF. Hearing Loss and Its Association with Clinical Practice at Dental University Students Through Mobile APP: A Longitudinal Study. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2020;10(99):3-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35740-5_1/COVER
Ordoñez Pintado AR, Trelles Méndez JA, Carrión Sarmiento MV, Zapata Hidalgo CD, Ramos Montiel R. Roossevelt. Cephalometric proportionality between the chin and its ante- rior projection in young andean adults. Revista Científica de La Universidad de Cienfuegos. 2021;13(5):439-444. https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/2253
Cocios Arpi JF, Trelles Méndez JA, Jinez Zuñiga PA, Zapata Hidalgo CD, Ramos Montiel R. Roossevelt. Correlación cefalométrica del mentón y cuerpo mandibular en adultos jóvenes andinos, año 2019 [Cephalometric correlation of the chin and mandibular body in young Andean adults, year 2019]. Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores. 2021;6. https://n9.cl/p627il
Sar SK, Shetty D, Kumar P, Juneja S, Sharma P. Leptin levels in gingival crevicular fluid during canine retraction: In vivo comparative study. Journal of Orthodontics. 2019;46(1):27-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465312518820533
Ribeiro GLU, Jacob HB. Understanding the basis of space closure in orthodontics for a more efficient orthodontic treatment. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2016;21(2):115-125. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.115-125.sar
González Andrade M, Lima Illescas M. Fricción de brackets autoligado y convencionales en el cierre de espacios: revisión de la literatura. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT. 2022;7(3-2):94-103. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2022.3-2.1197
Gómez Gómez SL, Sánchez Obando N, Álvarez Castrillón MA, Montoya Goez Y, Ardila CM. Comparison of frictional forces during the closure of extraction spaces in passive self-ligating brackets and conventionally ligated brackets using the finite element method. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2019;11(5):e439-e446. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.55739
Rizk MZ, Mohammed H, Omar I, Bearn DR. Effectiveness of en masse versus two-step retraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Progress in Orthodontics. 2018;18(1):1-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0196-7
McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. Evolution of treatment mechanics and contemporary appliance design in orthodontics: A 40-year perspective. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2015;147(6):654-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.012
Dehbi H, Azaroual MF, Zaoui F, Halimi A, Benyahia H. Therapeutic efficacy of self-ligating brackets: A systematic review. In International Orthodontics. 2017;15(3):297-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2017.06.009
Felicita AS. Quantification of intrusive/retraction force and moment generated during en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using mini-implants: A conceptual approach. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2017;22(5):47-55. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.5.047-055.oar
Shayeb RA, Alhaija ESA, Al Khateeb S, Rashaid AHB. The effect of intraoral aging of the working stainless steel archwire on the rate of premolar extraction space closure: a randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2022;26(3):3011-3020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04283-y
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Guido Oswaldo Pino-Vela, Katherine Viviana Villacis-Copo, Diana Patricia Álvarez-Álvarez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/saludyvida/oai.
