Pouring of plaster on skirting boards and waxing of casings Which is more practical?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/s.v.v8i1.3872Keywords:
Dental prosthesis, prostheses and implants, dental equipment, (Source: DeCS)Abstract
Objective: to compare the casting of plaster in skirting boards and wax plaster casts with the intention of finding out which is more practical for student apprentices. Method: Descriptive documentary, 15 works published in Scielo, PubMed, Latindex were reviewed. Conclusion: Two methods of casting plaster models were determined in more depth. On the one hand, there is plaster casting, which is the procedure for cutting out dental models, and on the other hand, there is wax casting, which is used to form a mold around the impression and then make the casting.
Downloads
References
Zhang YJ, Shi JY, Qian SJ, Qiao SC, Lai HC. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2021;14(2):157-179.
Flügge T, van der Meer WJ, Gonzalez BG, Vach K, Wismeijer D, Wang P. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29 Suppl 16:374-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13273
Rutkūnas V, Gečiauskaitė A, Jegelevičius D, Vaitiekūnas M. Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10 Suppl 1:101-120.
Albanchez-González MI, Brinkmann JC, Peláez-Rico J, López-Suárez C, Rodríguez-Alonso V, Suárez-García MJ. Accuracy of Digital Dental Implants Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners Compared with Conventional Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042026
Meneghetti PC, Li J, Borella PS, Mendonça G, Burnett LH Jr. Influence of scanbody design and intraoral scanner on the trueness of complete arch implant digital impressions: An in vitro study. PLoS One. 2023;18(12):e0295790. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295790
Marques S, Ribeiro P, Falcão C, et al. Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry: A Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031020
Khan SA, Singh S, Neyaz N, Jaiswal MM, Tanwar AS, Singh A. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(2):172-178.
Kim HS, Lee JH, Lee SY. Accuracy of Impression Techniques for Dental Implants Placed in Five Different Orientations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022;37(5):997-1002. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9441
Roca-Sacramento C, Ibarra-Vásquez L, Amado-Chavez JD, Saucedo-García A, Castro-Rodríguez Y. Influencia de las condiciones del tiempo y almacenamiento en la estabilidad dimensional de los moldes fabricados a partir de hidrocoloides irreversibles [Influence of time and storage conditions on the dimensional stability of moulds made from irreversible hydrocolloids]. Odontol Sanmarquina. 2018;21(2):81-6.
Azpiazu-Flores FX, Mata-Mata SJ, Lee DJ. Detection of mandibular flexure with a dental plaster verification device: A clinical report with video recording. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;130(6):807-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.039
Darmawan I, Willy O, Budiman JA. Setting time of construction gypsum, dental plaster, and white orthodontic gypsum. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020;14(3):167-170. https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2020.036
Gupta R, Brizuela M. Dental Impression Materials. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls.
Chandramohan D, Cao P, Han M, et al. Bone material analogues for PET/MRI phantoms. Med Phys. 2020;47(5):2161-2170. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14079
Svegard J, Nordvall Persson A, Zetterlund C, Alkner B. Comparison of use of plaster casting versus elastic bandage following carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled study. J Rehabil Med. 2021;53(3):jrm00168. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2788
Walter C, Sachsenmaier S, Wünschel M, Teufel M, Götze M. Clubfoot treatment with Ponseti method-parental distress during plaster casting. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01782-8
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yordan Josué Álvarez-Delgado, Cristhian Eduardo Chávez-Del-Pozo, Emily Samantha Fonseca-Vinueza, Luis Darío Pérez-Villalba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/saludyvida/oai.
