Use of mini-implants in the orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/s.v.v6i1.1779Keywords:
Activator Appliances, Extraoral Traction Appliances, Orthodontics. (Fuente, DeCS).Abstract
Objective: To analyze the available scientific evidence on the use of mini-implants in the orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions. Materials and methods: A descriptive research with documentary design was carried out. Results: The review of the literature showed that mini-implants, as skeletal anchorage units, are effective in the distalization of molars and, therefore, in the orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion, demonstrating superior anchorage stability in comparison with other dental anchorage modalities. Conclusion: The use of mini-implants provides adequate skeletal anchorage necessary for the treatment of Class II malocclusion. However, it is important to know the influence of the forces applied to the system in order to design correct biomechanics and control possible collateral effects. In any case, the individual assessment of each patient is fundamental to guarantee the success of the treatment.
Downloads
References
Carvalho Ferreira FP, Barbosa Lima AP, de Paula EC, Ferreira Conti AC, Valarelli DP, de Almeida-Pedrin RR. Orthodontic Protocol Using Mini-Implant for Class II Treatment in Patient with Special Needs. Case Rep Dent. 2016;2016:1057263. doi: 10.1155/2016/1057263.
Nagayama K., Tomonari H., Kitashima F., Miyawaki S. Extraction treatment of aClass II division 2 malocclusion with mandibular posterior discrepancy and changes in stomatognathic function. Angle Orthodontist. 2015;85(2):314–321. doi: 10.2319/031414-194.1.
Saikoski L. Z., Cançado R. H., Valarelli F. P., de Freitas K. M. S. Dentoskeletal effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with the Twin Block appliance in a Brazilian sample: a prospective study. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2014;19(1):36–45. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.036-045.oar.
Shimizu R. H., Ambrosio A. R., Shimizu I. A., Godoy-Bezerra J., RIbeiro J. S., Staszak K. R. Biomechanic principles of the headgear appliance. R Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2004;9:122–156.
El-Dawlatly, M., Abou-EL-Ezz, A., El-Sharaby, F. et al. Zygomatic mini-implant for Class II correction in growing patients. J Orofac Orthop 2014;75:213–225. doi.org/10.1007/s00056-014-0214-z
Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Soldevilla L, Valerio MV, Bellini-Pereira SA, Vilanova L, Arriola-Guillén LE, Janson G. Class II malocclusion treatment with a customized dual force distalizer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;160(5):743-756. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.037.
Klaus K, Stark P, Serbesis TSP, Pancherz H, Ruf S. Excellent versus unacceptable orthodontic results: influencing factors. Eur J Orthod 2017;39:615-21.
Pacha MM, Fleming PS, Johal A. A comparison of the efficacy of fixed versus removable functional appliances in children with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2016;38:621-30.
Fudalej P, Antoszewska J. Are orthodontic distalizers reinforced with the temporary skeletal anchorage devices effective? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:722-9.
Chiu PP, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:353-65.
Patel MP, Janson G, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, de Freitas MR, Pinzan A, et al. Comparative distalization effects of Jones jig and pendulum appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:336-42.
Mohamed RN, Basha S, Al-Thomali Y. Maxillary molar distalization with miniscrew-supported appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2018;88:494-502.
Lim SM, Hong RK. Distal movement of maxillary molars using a lever-arm and mini-implant system. Angle Orthod 2008;78:167-75.
Kinzinger GSM, Gulden N, Yildizhan F, Diedrich PR. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew
Cozzani M, Fontana M, Maino G, Maino G, Palpacelli L, Caprioglio A. Comparison between direct vs indirect anchorage in two miniscrew-supported distalizing devices. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:399-406.
Duran GS, Gorg ES, Dindaro E, Glu F. Three-dimensional analysis of tooth movements after palatal miniscrew-supported molar distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:188-97.
Bozkaya E, Tortop T, Yuksel S, Kaygeisiz E. Evaluation of the effects of the hybrid Pendulum in comparison with the conventional Pendulum appliance. Angle Orthod 2020;90:194-201.
Sadek MM, Sabet NE, Hassan IT. Maxillary arch distalization using interradicular miniscrews and the lever-arm appliance: a case report. J World Fed Orthod 2017;6:131-8.
Kayalar E, Batu-Guney A, Marsan G, Firatli S. Consecutive use of mini-implants in the palate to treat skeletal maxillary constriction and Class II malocclusion in an adult case. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(11):1624-1627.
Jung MH. Vertical control of a Class II deep bite malocclusion with the use of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155(2):264-275.
Gallegos-Salazar Aylin, Vidalón-Castilla Jose. Tratamiento de la maloclusión clase II-1 con mini-implantes: reporte de caso. Rev. Estomatol. Herediana. 2017;25(1):52-60.
Cuesta E, Gurrola B, Casasa A. Corrección de maloclusión clase II con micro tornillos en cresta infra cigomática. Revista Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia y Odontopediatría. 2018.
Arvind P TR, Jain RK. Skeletally anchored forsus fatigue resistant device for correction of Class II malocclusions-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24(1):52-61.
Papadopoulos MA, Tarawneh F. The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: A comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2017;103:e6-15.
Ludwig B, Baumgaertel S, Bowman SJ. Mini-Implants in Orthodontics: Innovative Anchorage Concepts. London: Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd.; 2008.
Casaña-Ruiz, M. D., Bellot-Arcís, C., Paredes-Gallardo, V., García-Sanz, V., Almerich-Silla, J. M., & Montiel-Company, J. M. (2020). Risk factors for orthodontic mini-implants in skeletal anchorage biological stability: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Scientific reports, 10(1),5848. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62838-7
Vázquez Amoroso Loris Mariana, Gutiérrez Herrada Yudelkys María, Antelo Vázquez Loris, Hernández González Leonor de las Mercedes, Castañeda Molerio Rafael, Martínez Riera Orlando. Los mini-implantes como anclaje óseo en el tratamiento ortodóncico [Mini-implants as bone anchorage in orthodontic treatment]. Mediciego.2016.22(4)2-21
Leo M, Cerroni L, Pasquantonio G, Condò SG, Condò R. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in orthodontics: review of the factors that influence the clinical success rate of the mini-implants. Clin Ter. 2016; 167(3):e70-7. DOI: 10.7417/CT.2016.1936
Benavides Chaverri Sandra, Cruz López Priscilla, Chang Valverde Mariela. Microimplantes, una nueva opción en el tratamiento de Ortodoncia []. Odontología Vital.2016;(25):63-75.
Batista KB, Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, O'Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;3(3):CD003452. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/saludyvida/oai.
