Ruling No. 2145-11-ep/22 of the Ecuadorian Constitutional Court and its relation with due diligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.3134Keywords:
Administration of justice, constitutional law, court of justice, (UNESCO Thesaurus)Abstract
The general objective of the research was to legally analyze Ruling No. 2145-11-ep/22 of the Ecuadorian Constitutional Court and its relationship with due diligence. The present research used the quantitative method which produces descriptive data, originating from data collection. Supported by the documentary-bibliographic review. In addition, the inductive-deductive method was applied. The analytical-synthetic method was also used. It is concluded that the sentence of the Extraordinary Action of Protection N°2145-11-EP/22 of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador, determines a severe affectation to the collective rights of the communities, peoples, and indigenous nationalities, the Afro-Ecuadorian, Montubio people and the communes in the case questioned with the Río Manta Commune.The constitutional relevance of the control of conventionality in Ecuador.
Downloads
References
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. https://n9.cl/sia
Carrillo, A. F. (2021). El accionar del Estado ecuatoriano en el derecho de repetición. [The actions of the Ecuadorian State in the right of repetition]. Revista Sociedad y Tecnología, 4(S2), 710-722. https://n9.cl/gc99t
CIDH. (2015). Caso Acevedo Jaramillo y otros Vs. Perú. [Case Acevedo Jaramillo et al. v. Peru]. https://n9.cl/3mj12
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2022). Sentencia: No. 2145-11-EP/22. [Ruling: No. 2145-11-EP/22]. Acción Extraordinaria de Protección. https://n9.cl/3ffze
Dávila Newman, G. (2006). El razonamiento inductivo y deductivo dentro del proceso investigativo en ciencias experimentales y sociales. [Inductive and deductive reasoning within the research process in experimental and social sciences]. Laurus, 12(Ext),180-205. https://n9.cl/nx847
González, F. (2021). Principio iura novit curia. [Iura novit curia principle]. https://n9.cl/b19kx
Loor, Y. L. (2021). Reparación Integral en materia constitucional. [Comprehensive redress in constitutional matters]. Derecho Ecuador. https://n9.cl/ycmik
Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (2023). Garantías de no repetición. [Guarantees of non-repetition]. https://n9.cl/xw2yv
Rodríguez, A., y Pérez, A. O. (2017). Métodos científicos de indagación y de construcción del conocimiento. [Scientific methods of inquiry and knowledge construction]. Revista EAN, 82,179-200. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n82.2017.1647
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Idelba Juliana García-Tapia, José Fabián Molina-Mora, Deinier Ros-Álvarez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
