Systems of 3D digital model accuracy vs. Analog models in dentistry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/s.v.v8i1.3724Keywords:
dental impression materials, dental implants, dentures, (Source: DeCS)Abstract
Objective: To analyze the precision systems in 3d digital models vs. analogous models in dentistry. Method: Descriptive observational study. Results: It is observed that the measurement of tooth #11 from the cervical margin to the incisal edge is carried out in the same way with a digital caliper, as well as the original measurement in the patient. Conclusion: It is shown that the best way to take dental impressions is digitally because it is more accurate and its precision allows us to have better results in the different oral rehabilitations that should be performed, thus providing a better service to both dentists and their patients. In the same way it is recommended to use digital models because their variation is smaller than the conventional plaster models, if the dimensional variation is smaller this means that the restoration and any dental rehabilitation treatment is more accurate.
Downloads
References
Papaspyridakos P, Vazouras K, Chen YW, et al. Digital vs Conventional Implant Impressions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(8):660-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13211
Petre AE, Pantea M, Drafta S, et al. Modular Digital and 3D-Printed Dental Models with Applicability in Dental Education. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59(1):116. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010116
Coachman C, Calamita MA, Sesma N. Dynamic Documentation of the Smile and the 2D/3D Digital Smile Design Process. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017;37(2):183-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.2911
Tian Y, Chen C, Xu X, et al. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning. 2021;2021:9950131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9950131
Lee C, Kobayashi H, Lee SR, Ohyama H. The Role of Digital 3D Scanned Models in Dental Students' Self-Assessments in Preclinical Operative Dentistry. J Dent Educ. 2018;82(4):399-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.21815/JDE.018.046
Mou QN, Ji LL, Liu Y, et al. Three-dimensional superimposition of digital models for individual identification. Forensic Sci Int. 2021;318:110597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110597
Viñas MJ, Pie de Hierro V, M Ustrell-Torrent J. Superimposition of 3D digital models: A case report. Int Orthod. 2018;16(2):304-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2018.03.017
Kardach H, Szponar-Żurowska A, Biedziak B. A Comparison of Teeth Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models. J Clin Med. 2023;12(3):943. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12030943
Berger L, Adler W, Kreuzer MMK, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Comparison of Digital and Conventional Impressions Based on the 3D Fit of Crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2022;35(6):801-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7652
Ferreira JB, Christovam IO, Alencar DS, da Motta AFJ, Mattos CT, Cury-Saramago A. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental measurements on tomographic digital models: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46(7):20160455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160455
Runkel C, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Keul C. Digital impressions in dentistry-accuracy of impression digitalisation by desktop scanners. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(3):1249-1257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02995-w
Verma RK, Singh SP, Verma S, Kumar V, Bhupali NR, Arora S. Comparison of reliability, validity, and accuracy of linear measurements made on pre- and posttreatment digital study models with conventional plaster study models. J Orthod Sci. 2019;8:18. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_14_19
Keul C, Güth JF. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(2):735-745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02965-2
Gül Amuk N, Karsli E, Kurt G. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning. Int Orthod. 2019;17(1):151-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.014
Reuschl RP, Heuer W, Stiesch M, Wenzel D, Dittmer MP. Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38(1):22-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv001
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Helen Dayana Tacuri-Eras, Francisco Xavier Andrade-Ortega, Leo Daniel Cabascango-Perugachi, Christian David Zapata-Hidalgo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/saludyvida/oai.
