Evaluación de las complicaciones inmediatas en la colocación de microimplantes infracigomáticos

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/s.v.v8i2.4271

Palabras clave:

Laboratorios odontológicos, prótesis dental, implantes dentales, (Fuente: DeCS)

Resumen

Objetivo: Analizar las complicaciones inmediatas en la colocación de microimplantes infracigomáticos para mejorar los protocolos clínicos y reducir eventos adversos. Método: Se realizó una revisión de la literatura en bases de datos entre marzo de 2013 y marzo de 2023, utilizando términos específicos y operadores booleanos para evaluar la frecuencia y severidad de las complicaciones. Resultados: El éxito de los microimplantes infracigomáticos varía según la técnica de inserción y las características anatómicas del paciente. Las complicaciones incluyen fracturas, desplazamientos y lesiones a estructuras anatómicas. Conclusiones: Es fundamental una evaluación anatómica detallada y la adaptación de protocolos basados en evidencia para minimizar riesgos. Se recomienda más investigación para desarrollar prácticas personalizadas y mejorar la tasa de éxito en la colocación de microimplantes.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Bungău TC, Vaida LL, Moca AE, Ciavoi G, Iurcov R, Romanul IM, Buhaș CL. Mini-implant rejection rate in teenage patients depending on insertion site: A retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022;11(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185331

Giudice AL, Rustico L, Longo M, Oteri G, Papadopoulos MA, Nucera R. Complications reported with the use of orthodontic miniscrews: A systematic review. Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2021;51(3):199-216. https://doi.org/10.4041/KJOD.2021.51.3.199

Truong VM, Kim S, Kim J, Lee JW, Park YS. Revisiting the complications of orthodontic miniscrew. In BioMed Research International. 2022;1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8720412

Murugesan A, Jain RK. A 3D comparison of dimension of infrazygomatic crest region in different vertical skeletal patterns: A retrospective study. International Orthodontics. 2020;18(4):770-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2020.09.002

Paul P, Mathur AK, Chitra P. Cone beam computed tomographic comparison of infrazygomatic crest bone thickness in patients with different facial types. Orthodontic Waves. 2020;79(2):99-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/13440241.2020.1814523

Jia X, Chen X, Huang X. Influence of orthodontic mini-implant penetration of the maxillary sinus in the infrazygomatic crest region. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2018;153(5):656-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.021

Du B, Zhu J, Li L, Fan T, Tan J, Li J. Bone depth and thickness of different infrazygomatic crest miniscrew insertion paths between the first and second maxillary molars for distal tooth movement: A 3-dimensional assessment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2021;160(1):113-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.03.036

Tavares A, Crusoé Rebello IM, Neves FS. Tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2020;12(11):1015-1020. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.57267

Uribe F, Mehr R, Mathur A, Janakiraman N, Allareddy V. Failure rates of mini-implants placed in the infrazygomatic region. Progress in Orthodontics. 2015;16(31). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0100-2

Gill G, Shashidhar K, Kuttappa MN, Kushalappa PBD, Sivamurthy G, Mallick S. Failure rates and factors associated with infrazygomatic crestal orthodontic implants - A prospective study. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2023;13(2):283-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.02.010

Pan Y, Wei L, Zheng Z, Bi W. An evaluation of bone depth at different three-dimensional paths in infrazygomatic crest region for miniscrew insertion: A cone beam computed tomography study. Heliyon. 2024;10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25827

Sreenivasagan S, Subramanian AK, Selvaraj A, Marya A. Pain perception associated with mini-implants and interventions for pain management: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. BioMed Research International. 2021;1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4842865

Motoyoshi M, Sanuki Suzuki R, Uchida Y, Saiki A, Shimizu N. Maxillary sinus perforation by orthodontic anchor screws. Journal of Oral Science. 2015;57(2):95-100. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.57.95

Golshah A, Gorji K, Nikkerdar N. Effect of miniscrew insertion angle in the maxillary buccal plate on its clinical survival: a randomized clinical trial. Progress in Orthodontics. 2021;22(22):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00370-8

Paul P, Mathur AK, Chitra P. Stress distribution patterns in mini-implant and bone in the infra-zygomatic crest region at different angulations: A finite element study. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. 2021;10(1):29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.11.004

Su L, Song H, Huang X. Accuracy of two orthodontic mini-implant templates in the infrazygomatic crest zone: a prospective cohort study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02285-0

Chang CH, Lin JS, Roberts WE. Failure rates for stainless steel versus titanium alloy infrazygomatic crest bone screws: A single-center, randomized double-blind clinical trial. Angle Orthodontist. 2019;89(1):40-46. https://doi.org/10.2319/012518-70.1

Kalra S, Tripathi T, Rai P, Kanase A. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: A CBCT study. Progress in Orthodontics. 2014;15(61):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0061-x

Descargas

Publicado

01-04-2024

Cómo citar

Siguencia-Avila, M. T., Zapata-Hidalgo, C. D., & Barzallo-Sardi, V. E. (2024). Evaluación de las complicaciones inmediatas en la colocación de microimplantes infracigomáticos. Revista Arbitrada Interdisciplinaria De Ciencias De La Salud. Salud Y Vida, 8(2), 828–844. https://doi.org/10.35381/s.v.v8i2.4271

Número

Sección

Original breve