Eficacia de la irrigación ultrasónica y la irrigación activada por láser en endodoncia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/s.v.v8i1.3913Palabras clave:
Irrigación terapéutica, canales de irrigación, salud bucal, (Fuente: DeCS)Resumen
Objetivo: Analizar la eficacia de la irrigación ultrasónica y la irrigación activada por láser en la eliminación de bacterias y residuos dentinarios durante el tratamiento de conducto radicular. Método: Descriptiva documental. Conclusión: Se confirmo que tanto el láser Er:YAG y el ultrasonido RinsEndo, son efectivos en la desinfección de los conductos radiculares, sin incrementar la concentración de la solución irrigante y confirmando un efecto de desinfección mejorado notablemente, a menor movimiento de la solución en ambas regiones del conducto. Haciendo que de esta forma aumente la seguridad del operador al realizar la irrigación dentro del conducto, evitando accidentes y del paciente al no presentar complicaciones o dolor postoperatorio.
Descargas
Citas
Shahravan A, Nekouei AH. Does ultrasonic activation of irrigation during endodontic therapy improve the clinical and microbiological effects? Evid Based Dent. 2022;23(3):118-119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0819-9
Susila A, Minu J. Activated Irrigation vs. Conventional non-activated Irrigation in Endodontics - A Systematic Review. Eur Endod J. 2019;4(3):96-110. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.80774
Badami V, Akarapu S, Kethineni H, Mittapalli SP, Bala KR, Fatima SF. Efficacy of Laser-Activated Irrigation Versus Ultrasonic-Activated Irrigation: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e36352. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36352
Adam M, Wootton J. Conventional vs ultrasonic irrigation - which leads to less post-operative pain? Evid Based Dent. 2022;23(2):50-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0274-7
Boutsioukis C, Arias-Moliz MT. Present status and future directions - irrigants and irrigation methods. Int Endod J. 2022;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):588-612. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13739
Vatanpour M, Toursavadkouhi S, Sajjad S. Comparison of three irrigation methods: SWEEPS, ultrasonic, and traditional irrigation, in smear layer and debris removal abilities in the root canal, beyond the fractured instrument. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022;37:102707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102707
Erkan E, Gündoğar M, Uslu G, Özyürek T. Postoperative pain after SWEEPS, PIPS, sonic and ultrasonic-assisted irrigation activation techniques: a randomized clinical trial. Odontology. 2022;110(4):786-794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-022-00700-0
Hamblin MR. Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery: A New Leap Forward Into the Light for the 21st Century. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018;36(8):395-396. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2018.29011.mrh
Kapetanović Petričević G, Katić M, Brzović Rajić V, Anić I, Bago I. The Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser-Activated Shock Wave-Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming Compared to Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Needle Irrigation in the Removal of Bioceramic Filling Remnants from Oval Root Canals-An Ex Vivo Study. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022;9(12):820. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120820
Liapis D, De Bruyne MAA, De Moor RJG, Meire MA. Postoperative pain after ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation during root canal treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2021;54(7):1037-1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13500
Aung N, Watanabe S, Kouno A, et al. Fluid Movement in the Apical Area Beyond the Ledge During Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation: A Particle Image Velocimetry Analysis. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020;38(7):438-443. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2019.4758
Yao K, Satake K, Watanabe S, Ebihara A, Kobayashi C, Okiji T. Effect of Laser Energy and Tip Insertion Depth on the Pressure Generated Outside the Apical Foramen During Er:YAG Laser-Activated Root Canal Irrigation. Photomed Laser Surg. 2017;35(12):682-687. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2017.4268
Aung NPS, Watanabe S, Okiji T. Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation in Comparison with Different Irrigation Systems for Cleaning the Apical Root Canal Area Beyond Ledge. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021;39(12):759-765. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2021.0044
Bordea IR, Hanna R, Chiniforush N, et al. Evaluation of the outcome of various laser therapy applications in root canal disinfection: A systematic review. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020;29:101611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.101611
Petričević GK, Katić M, Anić I, Salarić I, Vražić D, Bago I. Efficacy of different Er:YAG laser-activated photoacoustic streaming modes compared to passive ultrasonic irrigation in the retreatment of curved root canals. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(11):6773-6781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04637-0
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Katherine Estefanía Fierro-Ortiz, Luis Antonio Valle-Baldeón, Rómulo Guillermo López-Torres
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/saludyvida/oai.
