Impacto de datos sintéticos generados mediante CTGAN en modelos de aprendizaje automático para la predicción

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/i.p.v8i15.5249

Palabras clave:

Inteligencia artificial, tratamiento de datos, análisis de datos, estadística, aprendizaje en línea, (Tesauro UNESCO)

Resumen

Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar comparativamente el desempeño predictivo y la explicabilidad de Regresión Logística, Random Forest y XGBoost entrenados con datos reales frente a datos reales aumentados con CTGAN. La presente investigación es de naturaleza computacional/experimental sobre modelos, de nivel predictivo, con enfoque cuantitativo, propósito comparativo y orientación aplicada. Los resultados expresaron aspectos contrarios a lo que reporta la mayor parte de la literatura consultada, añadir datos sintéticos al entrenamiento no mejoró el desempeño predictivo de ninguno de los tres modelos, sino que lo redujo de forma estadísticamente significativa, incluso cuando esos mismos datos sintéticos superaron la validación estadística de fidelidad frente a los datos reales. En conclusión, a nivel teórico, el estudio aporta un caso concreto sobre la relación entre fidelidad estadística y utilidad predictiva de los datos sintéticos, un aspecto todavía poco explorado en la literatura revisada.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Adiputra, I. N. M., Lin, P.-C., & Wanchai, P. (2025). The effectiveness of generative adversarial network-based oversampling methods for imbalanced multi-class credit score classification. Electronics, 14(4), Article 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14040697

Ali Shahee, S., & Patel, R. (2025). An explainable ADASYN-based focal loss approach for credit assessment. Journal of Forecasting, 44(4), 1513–1530. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3252

Borisov, V., Leemann, T., Seßler, K., Haug, J., Pawelczyk, M., & Kasneci, G. (2024). Deep neural networks and tabular data: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 35(6), 7499–7519. https://n9.cl/khip9

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. En Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794). https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

El Sayad, I., Chong, F. H. L., & Gosal, B. (2026). Risk assessment in mortgages: A comparative study of AI models. PeerJ Computer Science, 12, Article e3494. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3494

Gao, X., & Zhou, Y. (2026). A resampling ensemble model for multi-window corporate default prediction under class imbalance. Systems, 14(7), Article 776. https://n9.cl/nk6n55

Gómez-de-Mariscal, E., Guerrero, V., Sneider, A., Jayatilaka, H., Phillip, J. M., Wirtz, D., & Muñoz-Barrutia, A. (2021). Use of the p-values as a size-dependent function to address practical differences when analyzing large datasets. Scientific Reports, 11, Article 20942. https://n9.cl/je6yl

Kheddar, H., Himeur, Y., Al-Maadeed, S., Amira, A., & Bensaali, F. (2023). Deep transfer learning for automatic speech recognition: Towards better generalization. Knowledge-Based Systems, 277, Article 110851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110851

Li, Z., Chen, G., Liu, Y., & Yuan, J. (2025). An efficient multi-institution collaborative learning framework based on knowledge filtering and data sharing. Cluster Computing, 28(10), Article 644. https://n9.cl/wmjvdd

Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://n9.cl/82snlp

Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. En 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE). BCS Learning & Development. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EASE2008.8

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing. https://n9.cl/rw7s1r

Pourkhoshgoftar, S., Shahbahrami, A., & Esmi, N. (2025). Graph-based inductive learning for credit risk prediction with imbalance mitigation. Computational Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-025-11114-9

Raheem, E. A., Dinar, A. M., Mohammed, M. A., & Al-Attar, B. (2024). Improving loan status prediction accuracy with generative adversarial networks: Addressing data scarcity and bias. Journal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of Things, 13(1), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.54216/JISIoT.130118

Ramachandra, P., & Vaithiyanathan, S. (2025). Fed-DPSDG-WGAN: Differentially private synthetic data generation for loan default prediction via federated Wasserstein GAN. IEEE Access, 13, 52069–52084. https://n9.cl/knhnf

Shan, W., Kang, X., & Gao, B. (2026). A TabPFN-based framework for credit risk prediction in automotive green supply chain finance. Sustainability, 18(12), Article 6305. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126305

Singhal, P., Walambe, R., Ramanna, S., & Kotecha, K. (2023). Domain adaptation: Challenges, methods, datasets, and applications. IEEE Access, 11, 6973–7020. https://n9.cl/3wvi76

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Xu, L., Skoularidou, M., Cuesta-Infante, A., & Veeramachaneni, K. (2019). Modeling tabular data using conditional GAN. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32. https://n9.cl/rfe5on

Xueping, Z., Samuri, S. M., & Adnan, M. H. M. (2026). Adaptive anomaly correction and dynamic sample balancing for deep intelligent credit risk assessment framework. NED University Journal of Research, 23(1), 44–69. https://doi.org/10.35453/NEDJR-ASCN-2025-007.R4

Zhao, X., & Guan, S. (2023). CTCN: A novel credit card fraud detection method based on Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Networks and Temporal Convolutional Network. PeerJ Computer Science, 9, Article e1634. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1634

Descargas

Publicado

09-10-2026

Cómo citar

Illescas-Espinoza, W., Loja-Mora, N., & Rivas-Asanza, W. (2026). Impacto de datos sintéticos generados mediante CTGAN en modelos de aprendizaje automático para la predicción. Ingenium Et Potentia, 8(15), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.35381/i.p.v8i15.5249

Número

Sección

De Investigación

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a