The parameters for the full reparation provided for in protective action judgments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2055

Keywords:

Human rights, legal systems, legal theory. (UNESCO Thesaurus).

Abstract

The general objective of the research was to legally analyze the parameters for the integral reparation provided in the protection action sentences. It was developed from a quantitative, descriptive perspective, complemented by a documentary-bibliographic design, which allowed the collection of information extracted from the different norms and laws, approaching the analytical method focusing on the study of particular aspects, examined in the analysis of written content, by means of the analytical-synthetic. Likewise, laws, norms, theories and refereed articles were analyzed. It is concluded that, the action of protection, according to the normative framework, is an effective and efficient means that seeks to repair the violated right, this according to what is established by international law, our country in the subject of rights has evolved from the moment it incorporated to its magna carta the positivization of the rights inherent to people for their quality of being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abarca Gáleas, L. (2013). La tutela Jurídica Constitucional del Debido Proceso. [Constitutional Due Process Legal Protection]. Quito. 1a. ed. Ed. Jurídica del Ecuador. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/8q8jz

Asamblea Nacional (2009). Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional. [Organic Law on Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control]. Segundo Suplemento del Registro Oficial No.52, 22 de octubre 2009. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/kqdip

Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia

Beristaín, C. (2008). Diálogos sobre la reparación. Experiencias en el sistema interamericano de derechos humanos, Tomo 2, San José de Costa Rica. [ Dialogues on Reparations. Experiences in the Inter-American Human Rights System, Volume 2, San José, Costa Rica]. Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, Agencia Sueca de cooperación internacional para el desarrollo. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/zkdku

Bernal-Torres, C. A. (2006). Metodología de la investigación. [Research methodology]. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/8txy.

Cevallos Zambrano, I. (2014) La Acción de Protección,Formalidad, Admisibilidad y Procedimiento. [The Protection Action, Formality, Admissibility and Procedure]. Primera Edición, Editorial Workhouse Procesal, Quito, Ecuador.

Consejo de la Judicatura. (2021). Corte de Justicia de Pichincha. Sentencias. [ Court of Justice of Pichincha. Sentences]. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/rkid3

Gómez, M. (2006). Introducción a la metodología de la investigación científica. [Introduction to the methodology of scientific research]. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/bm0s

Granda Torres, G., y Herrera Abrahán, C. (2019). Análisis de los tipos penales y su importancia para determinar responsabilidad penal. [ Analysis of criminal types and their importance for determining criminal liability]. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 4(7), 220-232. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35381/racji.v4i7.443

Martínez Morales, R. (2017). Diccionario jurídico: teórico práctico. [Legal dictionary: theoretical and practical]. IURE Editores. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/x6ijv7

Palella Stracuzzi, S. y Martins Pestana, F. (2012). Metodología de la investigación cuantitativa. [Quantitative research methodology]. Fondo editorial de la Universidad Pedagógica Libertador. Caracas, Venezuela.

Secretaría General OEA. (1969). Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos (Pacto de San José). [American Convention on Human Rights (Pact of San José)]. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/780p

Published

2022-11-26

How to Cite

Cabrera-Pino, M. S., Suárez-Merino, E. N., Cornejo-Aguiar, J. S., & Salim-Zaidan, A. M. (2022). The parameters for the full reparation provided for in protective action judgments. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 7(2), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2055

Issue

Section

De Investigación

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>