Pre and post orthodontic treatment models scanned with Class I and II malocclusions.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/s.v.v9i1.4514Keywords:
Orthodontics, dental models, dental arch, (Source: DesCs).Abstract
Objective: To establish differences in the pre and post orthodontic treatment models scanned with different malocclusions in patients treated in the specialty of Orthodontics, Azogues branch of the Catholic University of Cuenca, 2021-2023. Methods: A quantitative observational, descriptive and retrospective study was carried out. The study models were taken from patients treated with fixed orthodontics without age restriction. The sample was probabilistic by convenience with a total of 15 models in each skeletal Class I and II group. The Wilcoxon test for traits was used with a significance level of 95%. Results: presented clinical changes in the variables molar class, intercanine length, intermolar length, arch form, majoral analysis. Statistically significant changes in first premolar and second mandibular premolar in Class I. Conclusion: Statistically significant changes were obtained in Class I, while Class II only presented clinical changes.
Downloads
References
Suryajaya W, Ismah N, Purbiati M. Accuracy of digital dental models and three-dimensional printed dental models in linear measurements and Bolton analysis. F1000Res. 2021;10. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.31865.2
Baciu ER, Budală DG, Vasluianu RI, Lupu CI, Murariu A, Gelețu GL, et al. A comparative analysis of dental measurements in physical and digital orthodontic case study models. Medicina (Lithuania). 2022;58(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091230
García D, Mongragón T, Mendoza A, Venegas R. Assessment of palate dimensions and its relation with vertical alterations. Rev Odontopediatr Latinoam. 2021. https://doi.org/10.47990/alop.v11i1.208
Todor BI, Scrobota I, Todor L, Lucan AI, Vaida LL. Environmental factors associated with malocclusion in children population from mining areas, Western Romania. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(18):1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183383
Crespo C, Domínguez C, Vallejo F, Liñán C, Castillo C del, León-Manco RA, et al. Impact of malocclusions on quality of life and need for orthodontic treatment in schoolchildren of two private schools Azogues-Ecuador, 2015. 2017;27(3).
Gera A, Gera S, Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. Does quality of orthodontic treatment outcome influence post-treatment stability? A retrospective study investigating short-term stability 2 years after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and in the presence of fixed retainers. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2022;25(3):368–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12545
Garg H, Khatria H, Kaldhari K, Singh K, Purwar P, Rukshana R. Intermolar and intercanine width changes among Class I and Class II malocclusions following orthodontic treatment. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Special Issue 1):S1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2049
Rafiei E, Haerian A, Fadaei Tehrani P, Shokrollahi M. Agreement of in vitro orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and digital models using Maestro 3D ortho studio software. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022;8(5):1149-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.605
Soboku T, Motegi E, Sueishi K. Effect of different bracket prescriptions on orthodontic treatment outcomes measured by three-dimensional scanning. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2019;60(2):69–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.2018-0030
Jiménez-Gayosso SI, Lara-Carrillo E, López-González S, Medina-Solís CE, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Hernández-Martínez CT, et al. Difference between manual and digital measurements of dental arches of orthodontic patients. Medicine (United States). 2018;97(22). http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010887
Borja Espinosa DM, Ortega Montoya EA, Cazar Almache ME. Prevalence of skeletal malocclusions in the population of Azuay province - Ecuador. Res Soc Dev. 2021;10(5):e24010515022. https://n9.cl/0ou2c
Omar H, Alhajrasi M, Felemban N, Hassan A. Dental arch dimensions, form and tooth size ratio among a Saudi sample. Saudi Med J. 2018;39(1):86–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2018.1.21035
Carter GA, McNamara JA. Longitudinal dental arch changes in adults. 1998.
Nojima K, McLaughlin RP, Isshiki Y, Sinclair PM. A comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms [Internet]. Angle Orthod. 2001;71(3):195–201. https://n9.cl/a326c
Mendoza P, Gutiérrez J. Dental arch form in orthodontics. Rev Tamé. 2015;327–33.
Acosta D, Porras A, Moreno F. Relation between the facial contour form, the dental arches and the upper central incisors shape in dental students from Universidad del Valle-Cali. Rev Estomatol. 2017;19(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.25100/re.v19i1.5719
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Paola Liseth Lara-Sierra, Miriam Verónica Lima-Illescas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/saludyvida/oai.
