El uso de herramientas tecnológicas en la educación activa. Revisión sistemática

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/e.k.v9i17.4895

Palabras clave:

Educación activa, herramientas tecnológicas, tecnologías educativas, revisión sistemática, aprendizaje activo, (Tesauro UNESCO).

Resumen

La educación activa se consolida como un enfoque pedagógico orientado a promover participación, autonomía y aprendizaje significativo en los estudiantes, apoyándose cada vez más en el uso de herramientas tecnológicas. El artículo se propuso analizar de manera sistemática la producción científica sobre el uso de herramientas tecnológicas en la educación activa, identificando tipos de herramientas empleadas, enfoques pedagógicos asociados y principales resultados reportados en procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura siguiendo las directrices del protocolo PRISMA, mediante la consulta de bases de datos científicas reconocidas y la aplicación de criterios de inclusión y exclusión previamente definidos. Los resultados evidenciaron diversidad de herramientas tecnológicas vinculadas a metodologías activas como el aprendizaje basado en proyectos, aprendizaje colaborativo y aula invertida. Se concluye que la integración pedagógica de la tecnología fortalece la educación activa, aunque persisten desafíos y líneas de investigación futura.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Alam, T. M., Stoica, G. A., & Özgöbek, Ö. (2025). Asking the classroom with technology: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00348-z

Babik, D., Gehringer, E., Kidd, J., & colleagues. (2024). A systematic review of educational online peer-review and assessment systems: Charting the landscape. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 1653–1689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10349-x

Bergdahl, N., Bond, M., Sjöberg, J., Dougherty, M., & Oxley, E. (2024). Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00493-y

Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E. et al. (2024). A meta-systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z

Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational psychologist, 49(4), 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

Córdova-Esparza, D.-M., Romero-González, J.-A., Córdova-Esparza, K.-E., Terven, J., & López-Martínez, R.-E. (2024). Active learning strategies in computer science education: A systematic review. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(6), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8060050

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & education, 123, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007

Dede, C. J., Jacobson, J., & Richards, J. (2017). Introduction: Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education. In Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education. (pp. 1-16). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5490-7_1

Gevorgyan, S. (2024). The use of adaptive learning technologies in e-learning for inclusive education: A systematic review. E-Learning Innovations Journal, 2(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.57125/ELIJ.2024.03.25.05

Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., Ghamrawi, N. A. R., Abu-Tineh, A., Alshaboul, Y., & Alazaizeh, M. A. (2025). A step-by-step approach to systematic reviews in educational research. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 549–566. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.2.549

Godsk, M., & Møller, K. L. (2025). Engaging students in higher education with educational technology. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 2941-2976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12901-x

Hoidn, S., & Reusser, K. (2020). Foundations of student-centered learning and teaching. In The Routledge international handbook of student-centered learning and teaching in higher education. (pp. 17-46). Routledge. https://n9.cl/x7ie78

Ješková, Z., Lukáč, S., Šnajder, Ľ., Guniš, J., Klein, D., & Kireš, M. (2022). Active learning in STEM education with regard to the development of inquiry skills. Education Sciences, 12(10), 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100686

Luo, J., Zheng, C., Yin, J., & Teo, H. H. (2025). Design and assessment of AI-based learning tools in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(42). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00540-2

Martin, L., Fischer, M., & Camilleri, A. F. (2025). Best practices for conducting systematic reviews: Perspectives of experienced systematic review researchers in educational sciences. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09819-9

McGee, R. G., Wark, S., Mwangi, F., & colleagues. (2024). Digital learning of clinical skills and its impact on medical students’ academic performance: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 24, 1477. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06471-2

Mekheimer, M. A. (2025). Effective technology integration in higher education: a mixed-methods study of professional development. Education and Information Technologies, 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13750-y

Naveed, Q. N., Choudhary, H., Ahmad, N., Alqahtani, J., & Qahmash, A. I. (2023). Mobile learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(18), 13566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813566

Otto, S., Lavi, R., & Bertel, L. B. (2025). Human-GenAI interaction for active learning in STEM education: State-of-the-art and future directions. Computers & Education, 105444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105444

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., …, Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Review, 10, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

Perez, E., Manca, S., Fernández-Pascual, R., & colleagues. (2023). A systematic review of social media as a teaching and learning tool in higher education: A theoretical grounding perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11921–11950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11647-2

Rotar, O. (2025). Beyond technology tools: supporting student engagement in technology enhanced learning. Education Sciences, 15(12), 1617. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121617

Sailer, M., Maier, R., Berger, S., Kastorff, T., & Stegmann, K. (2024). Learning activities in technology-enhanced learning: A systematic review of meta-analyses and second-order meta-analysis in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 112, 102446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102446

Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 14(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0

Sum, M. Q., & Oancea, A. (2022). The use of technology in higher education teaching by academics during the COVID-19 emergency remote teaching period: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00364-4

Wei, Z., Liao, J., Lee, L. H., Qu, H., & Xu, X. (2025). Towards Enhanced Learning through Presence: A Systematic Review of Presence in Virtual Reality Across Tasks and Disciplines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13845. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.13845

Wong, B. T. M., & Li, K. C. (2020). A review of learning analytics intervention in higher education (2011–2018). Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00143-7

Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez‐Maldonado, R., Chen, G., ... & Gašević, D. (2024). Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 90-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13370

Yu, Q., Yu, K., Li, B., & Wang, Q. (2025). Effectiveness of blended learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of research on Technology in educaTion, 57(3), 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2264984

Zou, Y., Kuek, F., Feng, W., & Cheng, X. (2025, March). Digital learning in the 21st century: trends, challenges, and innovations in technology integration. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1562391. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391

Descargas

Publicado

01-01-2026

Cómo citar

Correa-Guarniz, M. A., Azpilcueta-Ruiz Esparza, M. de J., Farnum-Castro, F., & Consuegra, D. (2026). El uso de herramientas tecnológicas en la educación activa. Revisión sistemática. EPISTEME KOINONIA, 9(17), 54–80. https://doi.org/10.35381/e.k.v9i17.4895

Número

Sección

De Investigación