Right to defence in electronic notifications of traffic offences

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.3266

Keywords:

Law, constitution, criminal law, (UNESCO Thesaurus)

Abstract

The general objective of the research was to legally analyse the right to defence in electronic notifications of traffic offences. This research used the quantitative method, which produces descriptive data, originating from data collection. It was supported by a documentary-bibliographic review. The inductive-deductive method was also applied. The analytical-synthetic method was also used. It is concluded that, at present, there are no clear rules governing the rules for imposing and contesting electronic traffic offences, because although the National Court of Justice and the Constitutional Court have been consulted, they have not defined the time period for notifying offences and, what is worse, the Constitutional Court's ruling has declared the conditional constitutionality of Art. 238 of the Regulations to the Organic Traffic Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asamblea Constituyente. (2008). Ley Orgánica de Transporte Terrestre Tránsito y Seguridad Vial. [Organic Law of Land Transportation, Transit and Road Safety]. Ley 1 Registro Oficial Suplemento 398 de 07-ago-2008. Última modificación: 21-ago-2018. Estado: Reformado. https://n9.cl/w1pes

Asamblea Nacional (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. [Comprehensive Criminal Code]. Registro Oficial Nº 180. https://url2.cl/53c6h

Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. https://n9.cl/i1ch

Asamblea Nacional. (2010). Código Orgánico de Organización Territorial, Autonomía y Descentralización. [Organic Code of Territorial Organization, Autonomy and Decentralization]. https://n9.cl/u4059

Comisión Nacional de Tránsito. (2015). Ley Orgánica Reformatoria de la Ley Orgánica de Tránsito Transporte Terrestre, Tránsito y Seguridad Vial. [Organic Reformatory Law of the Organic Law of Transit, Land Transportation, Transit and Road Safety]. https://n9.cl/ub6rv

Consejo Nacional de Competencias. (2012). Resolución No. 006-CNC-2012. [Resolution No. 006-CNC-2012].

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2013). Sentencia No. 199-13-SEP. [Ruling No. 199-13-SEP]. Caso No. 1310-10-EP.

Corte Nacional de Justicia. (2016). Consulta a la Corte Nacional de Justicia. [Consultation with the National Court of Justice]. Oficio No. 957-2016-CNJ-DAJP-MT, Quito.

Dávila Newman, G. (2006). El razonamiento inductivo y deductivo dentro del proceso investigativo en ciencias experimentales y sociales. [Inductive and deductive reasoning within the research process in experimental and social sciences]. Laurus, 12(Ext), 180-205. https://n9.cl/nx847

Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Publica. (2021). Oficio MTOP-DDT-21-80-OF, ACUERDO MINISTERIAL No. 009-2021. [Office MTOP-DDT-21-80-OF, ACUERDO MINISTERIAL No. 009-2021]. Ambato. Quito, Ecuador. https://n9.cl/j60geo

Rodríguez, A., y Pérez, A. O. (2017). Métodos científicos de indagación y de construcción del conocimiento. [Scientific methods of inquiry and knowledge construction]. Revista EAN, 82, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n82.2017.1647

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Flores-Pesantes , F. R., Cornejo-Aguiar, J. S., Castro-Sánchez , F. D. J., & Saquicela-Rodas, I. (2023). Right to defence in electronic notifications of traffic offences. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 8(1), 1055–1064. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.3266

Issue

Section

De Investigación

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>