Legal certainty as a constitutional right in indigenous justice and ordinary justice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v9i1.3440

Keywords:

Constitutional law, legal systems, law, (UNESCO Thesaurus)

Abstract

The general objective of the research was to carry out a legal analysis of legal security as a constitutional right in indigenous and ordinary justice. This research used the quantitative method, which produces descriptive data, originating from data collection. Supported by the documentary-bibliographic review. In addition, the inductive-deductive method was used. The analytical-synthetic method was also used. A survey was carried out with a sample of 10 members of the indigenous community. It is concluded that, from the correct application of ordinary justice and indigenous justice, it can be concluded that they have their different methods, but with the same purpose: order and legal security; so that the decisions taken both in one jurisdiction and in the other must be adjusted to the basic principles of law, guarantee human rights and apply true justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anaya, J. (2018). Derechos de los pueblos indígenas. [Indigenous peoples' rights]. https://n9.cl/kjaox

Asamblea Nacional (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. [Comprehensive Criminal Code]. Registro Oficial Nº 180. https://url2.cl/53c6h

Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. https://n9.cl/546ps

Asamblea Nacional (2009). Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional. [Organic Law on Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control]. Ley 0. Registro Oficial Suplemento 52 de 22-oct-2009.Estado: Vigente. https://n9.cl/su7v

Atupañá, N. (2016). El conflicto de competencia en la justicia indígena del Ecuador. [The conflict of competence in Ecuador's indigenous justice system]. https://n9.cl/02go

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (2014). Sentencia No. 110-14-SEP-CC. [Ruling No. 110-14-SEP-CC]. https://n9.cl/dmw2vh

Dávila Newman, G. (2006). El razonamiento inductivo y deductivo dentro del proceso investigativo en ciencias experimentales y sociales. [Inductive and deductive reasoning within the research process in experimental and social sciences]. Laurus, 12(Ext), 180-205. https://n9.cl/nx847

Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia (2015). ¿Qué son los derechos humanos? [What are human rights?]. https://n9.cl/dk750

Mendoza, A. (2009). Los Derechos colectivos Indígenas en el Ecuador. [Collective Indigenous Rights in Ecuador]. (Tesis de Pregrado). Universidad de Cuenca. https://n9.cl/tg41u

Peñafiel, N. (2017). El desconocimiento de la justicia ordinaria a la justicia indígena en la comunidad de San Pedro del cantón Cañar. [The disregard of the ordinary justice system for indigenous justice in the community of San Pedro in the canton of Cañar]. (Tesis de Maestría). Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar. https://n9.cl/q7d58

Rodríguez, A., y Pérez, A. O. (2017). Métodos científicos de indagación y de construcción del conocimiento. [Scientific methods of inquiry and knowledge construction]. Revista EAN, 82, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n82.2017.1647

Published

2024-02-01

How to Cite

Villarreal-López, E. N., Benítez-Rosero, P. D., Narváez-Aguilar, M. J., & Lizcano-Chapeta, C. J. (2024). Legal certainty as a constitutional right in indigenous justice and ordinary justice. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 9(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v9i1.3440

Issue

Section

De Investigación

Most read articles by the same author(s)