Infringement of legal certainty by the National Court of Justice, Ecuador

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.2738

Keywords:

Security, right to justice, human rights, (UNESCO Thesaurus)

Abstract

The general objective of the research was to legally analyze the violation of legal security from the National Court of Justice, Ecuador. The research modality was based on the quantitative paradigm, with a descriptive documentary-bibliographic methodology, using documents, legal texts and scientific research on the subject. The survey technique was also used, for which a population of 6 prosecutors working in the Judicial Function of Guaranda was defined, so that they could ratify or not the problems described. It is concluded that the State must strengthen fundamental guarantees by reducing criminal law to the minimum necessary, setting reasonable limits to the penalty and considering the suspension of the same based on the principle of minimum criminal intervention in relation to the due proportionality between the legal right protected and the punishability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguero, S. (2018). Pobreza, Corrupción, (In) Seguridad Jurídica.[Poverty, Corruption, (In) Legal Security]. Buenos Aires: Eunomia.

Alvarado, A. (2010). El garantismo procesal. [Procedural guarantees]. Rosario,Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Rosario.

Asamblea Nacional (2009). Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional. [Organic Law on Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control]. Segundo Suplemento del Registro Oficial No. 52, 22 de octubre 2009. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/kqdip

Asamblea Nacional (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. [Comprehensive Criminal Code]. Registro Oficial Nº 180. Recuperado de https://url2.cl/53c6h

Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia

Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2015). Código Orgánico de la Función Judicial. [Organic Code of the Judicial Function]. Ley 0 Registro Oficial Suplemento 544 de 09-mar.-2009. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/wm4o

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2016).Resolución Nº.002-2016. [Resolution Nº.002-2016]. Primer Suplemento del Registro Oficial No. 739. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/ifxdw

López, J., y Chimbo, D. (2019). Compilación: SRE, LOGJCC, COFJ, COIP. [Compilation: SRE, LOGJCC, COFJ, COIP]. Quito: Sofigraf.

Marino, S. (2015). El juicio penal abreviado. [The abbreviated criminal trial]. Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot.

Segarra, D. (6 agosto 2019). Límites del Procedimiento Abreviado como Garantía del Derecho Humano a la Presunción de Inocencia a Partir de la Vigencia del COIP. [Limits of the Abbreviated Procedure as a Guarantee of the Human Right to the Presumption of Innocence as of the Effective Date of COIP]. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/qk8vg

Zapatier, G. (2018). Derechos procesales en conflicto. La Resolución 002-2016 de la Corte Nacional de Justicia: Prohibición de la suspensión condicional de la pena para el sujeto procesado en el procedimiento abreviado. [Procedural rights in conflict. Resolution 002-2016 of the National Court of Justice: Prohibition of conditional suspension of the sentence for the prosecuted subject in the abbreviated procedure]. Quito: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador.

Published

2023-05-01

How to Cite

Rosillo-Solano, J. C., Suárez-Merino, E. N., Cornejo-Aguiar , J. S., & Romero-Fernández, A. J. (2023). Infringement of legal certainty by the National Court of Justice, Ecuador. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 8(1), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.2738

Issue

Section

De Investigación

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>