Constitutional and ordinary legal interpretation: Preeminent in the weighing of rights

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2174

Keywords:

Comparative law, right to justice, human rights, human rights. (UNESCO Thesaurus).

Abstract

The general objective of this research was to legally analyze the constitutional and ordinary legal interpretation: Preeminent in the weighting of rights. The approach taken by the researchers for the development of the methodology was based on the methodology with quantitative approach, through the inquiry, collection and critical analysis of documents and bibliographic references, based on the methodical, rigorous and deep exploration of various documentary sources consisting of articles, rules and laws among others, describing the findings. In the research, documentary review was used as a technique. It is concluded that the constitutional and ordinary legal interpretation of the weighting of rights is an act in which the prevalence of the norm that most favors the principles and rights established in the Constitution is sought, since the operators of justice must seek an effective way, so that fundamental rights are not affected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexy, R. (2009). Derechos fundamentales, ponderación y racionalidad. [Fundamental rights, weighting and rationality]. Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Procesal Constituciona, 11; 3-14.Recuperaddo de: https://n9.cl/3v71i

Asamblea Nacional. (2009). Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional. [Organic Law on Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Oversight]. Ley 0 Registro Oficial Suplemento 52 de 22-oct-2009 Estado: Vigente. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/6x0j6

Burga Coronel, A. (2017). El test de ponderación o proporcionalidad de los derechos

fundamentales en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional peruano. [The test of weighting or proportionality of fundamental rights in the jurisprudence of the Peruvian in the jurisprudence of the Peruvian Constitutional Court]. Gaceta Constitucional N° 47. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/hmgvf

Carpio Marcos, E. (2003). La interpretación de los derechos fundamentales. [The interpretation of fundamental rights]. Derecho PUCP, (56), 463-530. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.200301.010

Cortes Zambrano, S. (2016). La Constitucionalización del Derecho y la Interpretación Jurídico Constitucional. [The Constitutionalization of Law and Constitutional Legal Interpretation]. Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi, 6(2), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.15332/s1909-0528.2011.0002.02

Flores, A. S. (2013). Interpretación y Ponderación de los Derechos Fundamentales en el Estado Constitucional. [Interpretation and Weighting of Fundamental Rights in the Constitutional State]. Tirant lo Blanch. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/dhlce

Galiano Maritan, G. (2020). La interpretación del Derecho en el ordenamiento jurídico ecuatoriano: estudio doctrinal y legal. [The interpretation of law in the Ecuadorian legal system: doctrinal and legal study]. Revista De Derecho, (27), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.5377/derecho.v0i27.9248

Martínez Dalmau, R. (2016). Problemas actuales sobre la interpretación constitucional de los derechos. [Current problems on the constitutional interpretation of rights]. Revista IUS, 10(37), 129-151. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/a4p9f

Muñoz Aranguren, A. (2018). Abuso del derecho y ponderación de derechos.[ Abuse of rights and balancing of rights]. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, 1-14; 35-48. DOI: 10.14198/DOXA2018.41.02

Ohtokani, Y. (2015). Ponderación y contenido esencial de los derechos fundamentales: una óptica distinta del Wesensgehalt.[ Weighting and essential content of fundamental rights: a different view of Wesensgehalt]. Revista de Investigación y Análisis DEJURE.13(14);89-119.Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/55jza

Pino, G. (2014). Derechos e interpretación. El razonamiento jurídico en el Estado constitucional. [Rights and interpretation. Legal reasoning in the constitutional state]. Universidad Externado de Colombia. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/0lv8d

Published

2022-08-15

How to Cite

Montenegro Altamirano, V. L., Menza Ortega, E. J., Méndez-Cabrita, C. M., & Rosero Morán, C. M. (2022). Constitutional and ordinary legal interpretation: Preeminent in the weighing of rights. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 7(2), 828–835. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2174

Issue

Section

De Investigación

Most read articles by the same author(s)