Need to regulate mediation as a mandatory prerequisite in food disputes

Authors

  • Iván Xavier León-Rodríguez Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes, Santo Domingo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3725-988X
  • Cristhian Teobaldo Sedeño-Jiménez Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes, Santo Domingo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v5i3.1134

Keywords:

Mediation, administration of justice, legal procedure.

Abstract

The objective of the research is to analyze the need to regulate mediation as a mandatory prerequisite in food disputes in Ecuador. It was developed from a descriptive documentary methodology with a non-experimental bibliographic design. In the Mediation Center of the Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas Judicial function Of the cases attended from January to December 2017 in cases attended 2,241, in hearings installed 1,242 is equivalent to 55.42%, with agreements reached 1,152 which represents 92.75% , in January to December 2018, in 20145 cases attended, with 1,156 hearings installed, equivalent to 56.53%. Mediation is an alternative method of conflict resolution in food trials, the procedure of which generates greater access to quickly decongest court cases in the management of justice and saves time, money, energy compared to a trial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asamblea Nacional. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Quito-Ecuador. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia

Cabanellas de Torres, G. (2006). Diccionario Enciclopedico de derecho usual. Buenos Aires.

Código de la niñez y adolescencia. (2003). (Ley No. 2002-100). Recuperado de https://n9.cl/fokqg

Codigo Organico de la Funciòn Judicial. (2009). Registro Oficial Suplemento 544 de 09-mar. -2009. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/wm4o

Jequier-Lehuedé, E. (2016). La mediación como alternativa de solución de los conflictos empresariales en Chile: Razones y mecanismos para su regulación [The mediation like an alternative for the solution of enterprise conflicts in Chile. Reasons and mechanisms for his regulation]. Revista de derecho (Valdivia), 29(1), 91-118. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09502016000100005

Ley de arbitraje y mediación y sus reformas. Publicada en el Registro Oficial 417 de 14 de diciembre de 2006). Recuperado de https://n9.cl/mjmos

Mazo-Álvarez, H. M. (2014). La mediación como herramienta de la justicia restaurativa [Mediation as a tool for restorative justice]. Opinión Jurídica, 12(23).

Rodrígues, C. (2017). La Mediación. ¿Una respuesta al nuevo paradigma del Derecho? [Mediation. An answer to the new paradigm of Law?]. Revista de Derecho (Universidad Católica Dámaso A. Larrañaga, Facultad de Derecho), (15), 243-256. https://dx.doi.org/10.22235/rd.v1i15.1382

Schiffrin, A. (1996). La mediación: aspectos generales [Mediation: general aspects]. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/ih0mw

Serrano-Lucero, C. (2016). Justicia restaurativa: la desatinada prohibición de la mediación penal en los asuntos de violencia de género [Restorative Justice: The Foolish Ban on Criminal Mediation in Gender Violence Matters]. CAPJuridica, 1(1), 147-178.

Vázquez-Martínez, A, & Bazán-Mayagoitia, N. (2019). Justicia restaurativa y reintegración social: retos procedimentales y estructurales [Restorative Justice and Social Reintegration: Procedural and Structural Challenges]. URVIO Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad, (24), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.17141/urvio.24.2019.3789

Published

2020-12-08

How to Cite

León-Rodríguez, I. X., & Sedeño-Jiménez, C. T. (2020). Need to regulate mediation as a mandatory prerequisite in food disputes. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 5(3), 590–605. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v5i3.1134