Review of the judicial motivation parameters in Ecuador

Abstract

An approach to jurisprudential development of the parameters that shape judicial motivation in Ecuador, reasonableness, logic and understandability is shown. It is intended to compile and describe the criteria that the Constitutional Court has had regarding this guarantee of due process and how certain judgments contribute with decisive progress to these parameters. For the above, qualitative research is carried out based on the historical - logical analytical-synthetic and inductive-deductive methods. It is concluded that it is essential that the judges merge their resolutions in any of the sources of law, that these must be applicable to the case, that there must be consistency between the premises and the conclusion and the latter with the decision of a resolution and finally that all this must be written in a clear, understandable way that allows the citizen in general to understand the resolution and be part of its inspection.