The crime of embezzlement: Comparative analysis between Ecuadorian, Peruvian and Spanish legislation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.3299

Keywords:

Criminal law, law, corruption, (UNESCO Thesaurus)

Abstract

The general objective of the research was to legally analyze the crime of embezzlement: Comparative analysis between Ecuadorian, Peruvian and Spanish legislation. The quantitative method was used, which produces descriptive data, originating from data collection. Supported by the documentary-bibliographic review. In addition, the inductive-deductive method was applied. The analytical-synthetic method was also used. It is concluded that, in the crime of embezzlement is of great value from the perspective of Criminal Law, by determining conducts that are criminally relevant and that protect legal goods that involve the state responsibility in the management of goods, which belong to all citizens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agudo E. (2018). Derecho Penal Aplicado. Parte Especial. Delitos Contra el Patrimonio y Contra el Orden Socioeconómico. [Applied Criminal Law. Special Part. Crimes against Patrimony and against the Socioeconomic Order]. Madrid: Dykinson, S.L.

Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. https://n9.cl/sia

Asamblea Nacional. (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. [Comprehensive Criminal Code]. Suplemento - Registro Oficial Nº 180. https://n9.cl/3iyct

Colina. P., y Martínez, A. (2009). Código Penal y Leyes Penales Especiales y Complementarias. [Penal Code and Special and Complementary Penal Laws]. Autores. Madrid: Wolters Kluwer España, S.A.

Dávila Newman, G. (2006). El razonamiento inductivo y deductivo dentro del proceso investigativo en ciencias experimentales y sociales. [ Inductive and deductive reasoning within the research process in experimental and social sciences]. Laurus, 12(Ext), 180-205. https://n9.cl/nx847

Kluwer, W. (2021). Código Penal. [Penal Code]. Madrid: Wolters Kluwer España. https://n9.cl/rnnuw

Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (2004). Convención de las Naciones Unidas Contra la Corrupción. [United Nations Convention Against Corruption]. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas. https://n9.cl/su3mc

Povis, E. A. (2005). La autoría y participación en el delito de Peculado comentarios a partir del caso Montesinos-Bedoya. [Authorship and participation in the crime of embezzlement comments based on the Montesinos-Bedoya case]. Instituto de Ciencia Procesal Penal.

Reátegui, J. (2017). Delitos contra la Administración Pública en el Código Penal. [Crimes against Public Administration in the Penal Code]. Lima: Jurista Editores. https://n9.cl/7jh14

República del Perú. (2020). Código Penal. [Penal Code]. Decreto Legislativo N. 635. https://n9.cl/5n08c

Rodríguez, A., y Pérez, A. O. (2017). Métodos científicos de indagación y de construcción del conocimiento. [Scientific methods of inquiry and knowledge construction]. Revista EAN, 82, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n82.2017.1647

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Costa-Torres , G. J., Granja-Zurita , D. F., & Estupiñan-Ricardo , J. (2023). The crime of embezzlement: Comparative analysis between Ecuadorian, Peruvian and Spanish legislation. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 8(1), 1305–1313. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.3299

Issue

Section

De Investigación

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>