The purpose of precautionary measures in the administrative litigation process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.2972Keywords:
Justice, administrative law, administrative court, (UNESCO Thesaurus)Abstract
The general objective of the research was to legally analyze the purpose of precautionary measures in the administrative litigation process. The method used in the research was based on the qualitative approach, handling the collection and analysis of a documentary-bibliographic typology. The research technique applied was the interview; the instrument was the interview guide, which was applied to the key informants. So that, with the expertise in the area of administrative law, they provide information, generating an analytical-reflexive process. It is concluded that the administrative precautionary measures are instruments of protection granted by competent authorities and are of great importance, since they become resolutions in order to restore rights that have been violated by public institutions, in this sense it must be understood that they are integral with the objective of an efficient and effective protection of rights.
Downloads
References
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia
Asamblea Nacional República del Ecuador. (2017). Código Orgánico Administrativo. [Organic Administrative Code]. Registro Oficial Nº 31 – Segundo Suplemento. Oficio No. SAN 2017-0403. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/tziya
Behar Rivero, D. (2018). Metodología de la Investigación. [Investigation methodology]. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/k9q2
Calamandrei, P. (2005). Introducción al estudio sistemático de las providencias cautelares. [Introduction to the systematic study of interim injunctions]. Perú: editores.
Coello Jácome, C. (2019). Las medidas cautelares dentro del proceso contencioso administrativo. [Precautionary measures in the administrative litigation process]. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/jx7j4
González Pérez, J. (1998). Comentarios a la Ley de la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa. [Commentaries on the Law on Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction]. (Ley 29/1998, de 13 de julio), 3ª ed., 2 volúmenes, Editorial Civitas, Madrid. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/6t45i
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., y Baptista, M. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. [Investigation Methodology] (Quinta Edición ed.). México: McGraw-Hill.
Morales Tobar, M. (2011). Manual de Derecho Procesal Administrativo. [Manual of Administrative Procedural Law]. Corporación de estudios y publicaciones.
Rodríguez Bejarano, C. (2011). El Plazo Razonable en el marco de las Garantías Judiciales en Colombia. [The Reasonable Term in the framework of Judicial Guarantees in Colombia]. Memorando de Derecho, 2(2);113-125.Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/50dd
Sialer Niquén, C. (2022). Aplicación del principio de privilegio de controles posteriores al proceso contencioso administrativo y consecuencias jurídicas. [Application of the principle of privilege of subsequent controls to the administrative litigation process and its legal consequences]. Revista Lex, 5(15), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistalex.v5i15.106
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ángeles Celeste Illicachi-Erazo , Pablo Miguel Vaca-Acosta, Fernando-De-Jesús Castro-Sánchez , Katty Muñoz-Vaca
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
