Infringement of the right to a defense in protection actions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.2776Keywords:
Right to justice, constitution, law, (UNESCO Thesaurus)Abstract
The general objective was to legally analyze the violation of the right to defense in protection actions. The research was developed from the quantitative paradigm, and was also framed from a documentary-bibliographic design, through the inquiry, collection and critical documentary analysis and bibliographic reference, based on the exploration of various sources articles, laws, regulations, refereed works, theses, among others. In addition, a questionnaire of 4 multiple choice questions was applied to a representative sample of 10 judges of the Judicial Unit of the Family, Women, Childhood and Adolescence of the Riobamba Canton. It is concluded that the constitutional principle of iura novit curia and effective judicial protection, when the parties do not request or do not invoke the application of a rule or principle that is beneficial to them, the judge has the obligation to apply it, just as he does at the time of qualifying a claim for a protective action.
Downloads
References
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia
Asamblea Nacional. (2008). Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional. [Organic Law on Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Oversight]. Ley 0. Registro Oficial Suplemento 52 de 22-oct.-2009.Estado: Vigente. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/su7v
Congreso Nacional. (2005). Código Civil. [Civil Code]. Registro Oficial Suplemento 46 de 24-jun.-2005 Última refoma: 08-jul.-2019. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/qks2i
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2010). Sentencia No. 075-10-SEP-CC.[Ruling No. 075-10-SEP-CC]. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/q7z0l
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2011). Sentencia No. 011-09-SEP-CC. [Ruling No. 011-09-SEP-CC]. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/4j89fs
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2013). Sentencia No. 935-13-EP/19.[Ruling No. 935-13-EP/19]. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/m6nc4q
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2020). Sentencia No. 889-20-JP/21. [Ruling No. 889-20-JP/21]. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/2ry3y
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2021). Sentencia No. 1001-16-EP/21. [Ruling No. 1001-16-EP/21]. CASO No. 1001-16-EP. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/i0r21
Ramírez, C. (2017). Apuntes Sobre la Prueba en el COGEP. [Notes on Testing at COGEP]. Corte Nacional de Justicia.
Robert, A. (2010). La construcción de los Derechos Fundamentales. [The construction of Fundamental Rights]. Derecho, Estado y Sociedad. Argentina. Buenos Aires. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/4iph3
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Roberto Patricio Tapia-Sánchez, Jesus Ricardo Estupiñan , Gustavo Adolfo Chiriboga-Mosquera , Jaime Rafael Vintimilla-Saldaña
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
