Applicability of treaty law in expropriation judgments. Case: Salvador Chiriboga versus Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i13.1997Keywords:
Administrative tribunals, public administration, administrative law. (UNESCO Thesaurus).Abstract
The objective is to analyze the applicability of conventional law in expropriation judgments. Case: Salvador Chiriboga versus Ecuador. Documentary type. It is necessary for the Ecuadorian State to take into account the sentences that have been issued against it by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, in order to avoid committing the same violations to the rights for which the country has been sanctioned. Therefore, the administrative actions regarding expropriation must be based on the parameters established by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in accordance with the American Convention on Human Rights, the need to perform an effective control of conventionality by the administrative authorities, who have the duty to enforce the provisions of the Convention, which is related to the analysis and compliance with the judgments issued against Ecuador, for its knowledge and application.
Downloads
References
Aguilar-Cavallo, G. (2019). El control de convencionalidad y la prohibición de la discriminación en Chile [The Control of Conventionality and the Prohibition of Discrimination in Chile]. Opinión Jurídica, 18(36), 57-85. https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v18n36a3
Castillo-Galvis, S, D’Janon Donado, M, & Ramírez Nárdiz, A. (2019). El control de convencionalidad y el diálogo judicial frente al medio ambiente como sujeto de protección y reparación [The Control of Conventionality and Judicial Dialogue in front of the Environment as a Subject of Protection and Reparation]. Cuestiones constitucionales, (41), 397-428. Epub 22 de abril de 2020.https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2019.41.13952
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Caso Salvador Chiriboga vs Ecuador. Sentencia de 6 de mayo de 2008. Recuperado de https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_179_esp.pdf
Gatti, F. (2017). El control de convencionalidad en la administración pública: posible aplicación de la Doctrina del margen de apreciación nacional [The control of conventionality in the public administration: possible application of the national margin of appreciation doctrine]. CÁLAMO / Revista de Estudios Jurídicos. Quito – Ecuador, 7, 59-67. https://calamo.ec/number/7
Herrera, A. (2016). El control de convencionalidad en materia de derechos humanos y la regularidad constitucional. Comentarios a la jurisprudencia 20/2014 de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación [The control of conventionality in human rights and constitutional regularity. Comments to the jurisprudence 20/2014 of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation]. Cuestiones constitucionales, (35), 277-288.
Humero, A. E. & Porto, E. (2019). Estudio integral de las valoraciones expropiatorias [Comprehensive study of expropriation appraisals]. Madrid: Dykinson, S.L.
Jácome-Ordoñez, M. del C. (2017). El control de convencionalidad y la protección del derecho a la propiedad privada a partir de la sentencia del caso Salvador Chiriboga vs. Ecuador [Conventionality control and the protection of the right to private property based on the Salvador Chiriboga vs. Ecuador judgment]. Foro: Revista De Derecho, (21), 45–62. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/432
Jongitud, J. (2017). Controlar al capital y redimensionar el derecho de propiedad: propuestas para la ética del desarrollo [Controlling capital and reshaping the right to property: proposals for development ethics]. Veritas, (37), 51-77. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-92732017000200051
López, S. (2015). La propiedad y su privación o restricción en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana [Property and its deprivation or restriction in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.]. Ius et Praxis, 21(1), 531-575. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122015000100015
Nogueira, H. (2017). El control de convencionalidad por los Estados parte de la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos y tribunales chilenos [Conventionality control by States Parties to the American Convention on Human Rights and Chilean courts]. Revista de Derecho (Universidad Católica Dámaso A. Larrañaga, Facultad de Derecho), (15), 143-200. https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v1i15.1375
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 María Cristina López-Hidalgo, María-Del-Carmen Jácome-Ordoñez, Fernando-De-Jesús Castro-Sánchez, Juan Carlos Benalcázar-Guerrón
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
