Electronic notification and its effectiveness in accordance with Ruling No. 71-14-CN/19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/r.k.v7i2.2194Keywords:
Administration of Justice, constitutional Law, law Enforcement, right to information, legal procedure. (UNESCO Thesaurus).Abstract
In the present work, a legal and dogmatic analysis was made about the right to notification, in accordance with the criteria established in sentence No. 71-14-CN/19 of the Ecuadorian Constitutional Court. In this research, traffic resolutions issued in the period April 2021 - April 2022 were analyzed to measure the percentage of erroneous resolutions in relation to the aforementioned Constitutional sentence, with respect to the effectiveness of electronic notifications made in traffic infractions captured by radars. The results reflected a deficient assessment of the validity of the notifications, contrary to the established constitutional precepts, which constitutes a violation of the right to due process and legal certainty of the defendants. Additionally, there was a deficient attention to the challenges presented, since a high percentage showed an unjustified delay in the response of the administration of justice.
Downloads
References
Artavia, S., & Picado, C. (2018). Notificaciones Procesales [Procedural Notifications]. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/4vhjw
Bernal, H., & Hernández, S. (2001). El debido proceso disciplinario [Disciplinary due process]. Biblioteca Jurídica Diké.
Cabanellas, G. (1979). Diccionario Jurídico Elemental [Elementary Legal Dictionary]. (primera). Heliasta S.R.L.
Codigo Orgánico Integral Penal del Ecuador. (2014). Registro Oficial Suplemento 180 de 10-feb.-2014 Ultima modificación: 17-feb.-2021. Obtenido de https://n9.cl/w5nul
Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008 Ultima modificación: 13-jul-2011. Recuperado de https://www.oas.org/juridico/pdfs/mesicic4_ecu_const.pdf
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. Sentencia No. 71-14-CN/19. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/rsi8q
Cueva, L. (2001). El debido proceso [Due process]. (1a ed.). Impreseñal Cía.
Geny, F., & Saleilles, R. (1925). Método de interpretación y fuentes en derecho privado positivo [Method of interpretation and sources in positive private law]. (2a ed., Vol. 1). REUS.
Larrea, J. (2008). Manual Elemental De Derecho Civil Del Ecuador: Vol. II [Elementary Manual Of Ecuadorian Civil Law: Vol. II]. Corporación de Estudios y Publicaciones.
Muñoz, F., & García, M. (2010). Derecho Penal: Parte general [Criminal Law: General Part]. (8a ed.). Valencia Tirant lo Banch.
Pulido, C. (2005). El derecho de los derechos escritos sobre la aplicación de los derechos fundamentales [The law of written rights on the application of fundamental rights]. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Suárez, A. (2001). El debido proceso penal [Criminal due process]. (2a ed.). Panamericana.
Tushnet, M. (2012). ¿Por qué la Constitución importa? [Why does the Constitution matter?]. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Vásconez, V. (2020). The extensive interpretation of the criminal nature of trafficking in scheduled substances subject to control: The case N° 18282-2018-00726. Facultad de Jurisprudencia, 8(2588–0837), 483–526.
Velásquez, G. (2021). Written Law and Interpretation, According to Gény. Ius Humani. Law Journal, 10(2), 27-48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.v11i1.266
Zavala, J. (2012). Teoría de la Seguridad Jurídica [Theory of Legal Security]. Iuris Dictio. Revista Del Colegio de Jurisprudencia, 14, 217–229.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/revistakoinonia/oai.
