Código Orgánico Integral Penal and the atypicality of electronic documents, Ecuador

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v9i1.3529

Keywords:

Criminal sanction, criminal law, cybercrime, (UNESCO Thesaurus)

Abstract

The general objective of the research was to legally analyze the Código Orgánico Integral Penal and the atypical nature of electronic documents, Ecuador. This research used the quantitative method, which produces descriptive data, originating from data collection. Supported by the documentary-bibliographic review. In addition, the inductive-deductive method was used. The analytical-synthetic method was also used. It is concluded that there is no reference to the forgery of electronic documents in the Organic Integral Penal Code.  It is necessary to establish a reform of Art. 328 of the COIP by mentioning the falsification of electronic documents, so that there is less confusion when applying the law without the need to resort to other types of laws in order to avoid impunity for a crime

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrade, V. (2019). Análisis de la falsificación de documentos y protección del bien jurídico en materia penal. [Analysis of the forgery of documents and protection of the legal right in criminal matters]. Journal of business and entrepreneurial studies, 4(1), 1-13. https://n9.cl/winwt

Asamblea Nacional (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. [Comprehensive Criminal Code]. Registro Oficial Nº 180. https://url2.cl/53c6h

Asamblea Nacional (2023). Ley de Comercio Electrónico, Firmas y Mensajes de Datos. [Law on Electronic Commerce, Signatures and Data Messages]. https://n9.cl/l1srj

Crespo-Berti, L. A. (2020). La acción nuclear del delito informático en el novísimo código orgánico integral penal. [The nuclear action of cybercrime in the new comprehensive organic penal code]. Revista Docentes 2.0, 9(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i1.89

Dávila Newman, G. (2006). El razonamiento inductivo y deductivo dentro del proceso investigativo en ciencias experimentales y sociales. [Inductive and deductive reasoning within the research process in experimental and social sciences]. Laurus, 12(Ext), 180-205. https://n9.cl/nx847

García Brito, P. J., y Arciniegas Castro, C. L. (2023). Las nuevas tecnologías frente al código orgánico integral penal. [New technologies versus the comprehensive organic criminal code]. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(4), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i4.1202

Rodríguez, A., y Pérez, A. O. (2017). Métodos científicos de indagación y de construcción del conocimiento. [Scientific methods of inquiry and knowledge construction]. Revista EAN, 82, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n82.2017.1647

Rojas González, G. (2018). La justicia y el Derecho. [Justice and the law]. En G. Rojas-Gonzáles (Ed.). Filosofía del Derecho. (pp. 63-77). Bogotá: Universidad Católica de Colombia. https://n9.cl/6jgko

Sacoto Romo, M., y Cordero Moscoso, J. (2021). E-justicia en Ecuador: inclusión de las TIC en la administración de justicia. [E-justice in Ecuador: inclusion of ICTs in the administration of justice]. Foro: Revista de Derecho, (36), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2021.36.5

Saltos Salgado, M., Robalino Villafuerte, J., y Pazmiño Salazar, L. (2021). Análisis conceptual del delito informático en Ecuador. [Conceptual analysis of cybercrime in Ecuador]. Conrado, 17(78), 343-351. https://n9.cl/fusnj

Published

2024-02-01

How to Cite

Malte-Guachán, D. J., Benalcázar-Pozo, A. R., Iñiguez-Narváez, J. S., & Santander-Moreno, J. J. (2024). Código Orgánico Integral Penal and the atypicality of electronic documents, Ecuador. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 9(1), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v9i1.3529

Issue

Section

De Investigación

Most read articles by the same author(s)