Critical view of the act of administration of justice

Abstract

The administration of justice has always been a human activity mediated by the way in
which power is exercised and the political system in which it is immersed. It is intended
in this theoretical reflection to analyze briefly how this historical journey has been and as
the categories of State, democracy, participation and justice, are intertwined and model
the types of judge and their attributions. Also the search for the guarantee of balance in
judicial decisions, is an ideal to which the justiciable aspire, on which depends the credibility and stability of any justice system, here is revealed from a critical view that
impartiality translates into a positive knowledge of the reality of parties to the dispute. It
is envisaged that a state that does not monopolize the power to judge, but rather
recognizes and augurs popular participation in the administration of justice, deepens
democracy, and may be the justice of communal peace a beginning. It is a documentary
research based on the bibliographic review of the subject matter of study, as a
technique is used the content analysis of the information extracted from the reviewed
sources