The procedural overload in the judicial unit of Cantón Tulcán, Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v9i1.3585Keywords:
Mediation, justice, constitutional law, (UNESCO Thesaurus)Abstract
The general objective of the research was to carry out a legal analysis of the procedural overload in the judicial unit of Cantón Tulcán, Ecuador. It used the quantitative method which produces descriptive data, originating from data collection. Supported by the documentary-bibliographic review. In addition, the inductive-deductive method was used. The analytical-synthetic method was also used. A sample of 20 people was established, including lawyers, judges and guardians of minors in the city of Tulcán, using a questionnaire as a data collection instrument. It is concluded that the procedural overload in the judicial system is an evident problem, as there is an immoderate amount of cases that need to be attended to. This procedural overload leads to long-term consequences, which can be detrimental to the parties involved in the different judicial processes.
Downloads
References
Asamblea Nacional de la República del Ecuador (2015) Código Orgánico General De Procesos. [General Organic Code of Processes]. 2 - Suplemento - Registro Oficial Nº 506 - viernes 22 de mayo de 2015. https://n9.cl/z8haz
Calvinho, G. (2017). La carga procesal y el dinamismo de la norma procedimental. [The procedural burden and the dynamism of the procedural rule]. Vox Juris, 34(2), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.24265/voxjuris.2017.v34n2.10
Cerna, J. (2019). Análisis de la sobrecarga procesal en los juzgados del Cercado de Lima y las estrategias para la descarga procesal efectiva. [Analysis of the procedural overload in the courts of Cercado de Lima and strategies for effective procedural discharge]. Tesis de Pregrado. Universidad Continental, Lima, Perú. https://n9.cl/wjj8f
Coello Avilés, E. M., Mazacón Solano, W. L., y Zurita Acurio, C. A. (2023). La justicia alternativa para mitigar la sobrecarga procesal y fortalecer la confianza en el sistema legal. [Alternative justice to mitigate procedural overload and strengthen confidence in the legal system]. Universidad y Sociedad, 15(S3), 110-119. https://n9.cl/pypj6
Dávila Newman, G. (2006). El razonamiento inductivo y deductivo dentro del proceso investigativo en ciencias experimentales y sociales. [Inductive and deductive reasoning within the research process in experimental and social sciences]. Laurus, 12(Ext), 180-205. https://n9.cl/nx847
Galante, M. (1974). Why the Haves Come Out Ahead. Buenos Aires.
Garth, M. C. (1978). Acceso a la justicia. [Access to justice]. Madrid.
Maxeiner, J. (2011). Failures of American Civil Justice in International Perspective. Buenos Aires.
Rodríguez, A., y Pérez, A. O. (2017). Métodos científicos de indagación y de construcción del conocimiento. [Scientific methods of inquiry and knowledge construction]. Revista EAN, 82, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n82.2017.1647
Villareal, P. (2019). Carga procesal: su incidencia en el despacho oportuno de audiencias en materia de niñez y adolescencia de Santo Domingo. [Procedural burden: its impact on the timely delivery of hearings in child and adolescent matters in Santo Domingo]. Tesis de Pregrado. Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes. https://n9.cl/cj1q2
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Miguel Ángel Chapi-Chenás, Vanessa Carolina Puedmag-Luna, Tania Lizbeth Guachán-Méndez, Jaime Rodrigo Cadena-Morillo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
