Habeas Corpus in the Ecuadorian constitutional system and its erroneous application

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2392

Keywords:

State, judge, court, normative (UNESCO Thesaurus)

Abstract

The objective of this research work is to analyze and understand Habeas Corpus and its erroneous application from different perspectives. The method used is of the descriptive documentary type with bibliographic design. Habeas Corpus was analyzed as a constitutional measure that benefits human beings and is contemplated in the regulations governing the Ecuadorian State as a special procedure used so that any person illegally detained is immediately brought before a judge or court, so that the judge can decide whether the detention is illegal, either by the manner of detention or by the excess of time and when violations are generated in its application, it is said that there is an erroneous application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asamblea Constituyente. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador] Montecristi, Ecuador. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/hd0q

CADH. (1997). Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos. Acuerdo Ministerial # 202. [American Convention on Human Rights. Ministerial Agreement # 202]. Registro Oficial # 801 Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/c6pat6

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (2020). Hábeas corpus respecto del internamiento preventivo de adolescentes Sentencia No.207-11-JH/20, [Habeas corpus with respect to the preventive detention of adolescents Ruling No.207-11-JH/20]. Caso No. 207-11-JH. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/qpt5k

Tribunal Constitucional del Perú (2010). Expediente. No.05559-2009-PHC/TC. [Case. No.05559-2009-PHC/TC]. Lima. (Mesias Ramírez Beaumont Callirgos ). Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/wsd29

García, F., Rojas, H., Meléndez, J., Nuñez, F., Muñoz, M., Roel, L., & Reyes, A. (2015). Tipos de hábeas corpus en la jurisprudencia del tribunal constitucional. Perú: Gaceta Jurídica, ISBN: 978-612-311-281-3 Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/rwb96

García, D. (2003). El Habeas Corpus en Latina América: Antecedentes, desarrollo y perspectivas. [ Habeas Corpus in Latin America: Background, Development and Prospects]. Revista PUCP Foro Jurídico, Vol.02, pp.143-146. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/06wdi

Herrera, Y. (2012). El Habeas Corpus. Guía Popular para su aplicación. [Habeas Corpus. Popular Guide for its application]. Quito: Fundación Regional de Asesoría en Derechos Humanos. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/hoamq

CIDH (1987). El Habeas Corpus bajo suspensión de Garantías. [Habeas Corpus under Suspension of Guarantees] Opinión Consultiva OC-8/87 Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/dsrla

LOGJCC. (2009). Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control de Constitucionalidad . Recuperado de:https://n9.cl/su7v

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (2018). Sentencia No. 002-18-PJO-CC, Caso No. 0260-15-JH [Judgment No. 002-18-PJO-CC, Case No. 0260-15-JH]. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/cortecostitucional

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (2015). Sentencia No. 171-15-SEP-CC, Caso N.° 0560-12-EP [Judgment No. 171-15-SEP-CC , Case No. 0560-12-EP]. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/megaw

Jaén, C. (2022). Deconstruyendo el hábeas corpus en Ecuador. Análisis de su eficacia respecto a las personas privadas de la libertad en centros carcelarios. [Deconstructing habeas corpus in Ecuador. Analysis of its effectiveness with respect to persons deprived of liberty in prisons]. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/efjz3

Published

2022-08-15

How to Cite

Bermeo-Alvarado., J. N., Román-Llamuca, M. E., & Tixi-Torres., D. F. (2022). Habeas Corpus in the Ecuadorian constitutional system and its erroneous application. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 7(2), 1410–1424. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2392

Issue

Section

De Investigación